The Reality

Your Next FedRAMP Audit: 16 Weeks of Chaos

4 sprints Feature freeze during audit prep
160 hrs Engineer time lost to interviews
500+ Screenshots gathered manually each cycle

The Hidden Cost

Every audit cycle, your best engineers become screenshot hunters.

What if evidence existed before the auditor asked? →
The Opportunity

What If Evidence Existed Before the Auditor Asked?

Your GRC tool covers 60%. The other 40% is pipeline evidence—and it's killing your audits.

Vanta/Drata Has

  • Policy management
  • Vendor questionnaires
  • Access reviews
  • Cloud configs

The Gap

40%

Pipeline evidence

FedRAMP Needs

  • Build attestations
  • SBOM/provenance
  • Code-level evidence
  • Automated SSP
How It Works

From repo to gap report in 15 minutes

1
Connect GitHub
OAuth, read-only access. Also works with GitLab, Bitbucket.
2
AI Scans Stack
Workflows, Dockerfiles, K8s manifests, serverless configs.
3
See Gap Report
Which controls are covered, which are missing, cost estimate.
No agents. No installation. Works with GitHub Actions, GitLab CI, Jenkins, CircleCI.
What We Automate

Control Documentation Coverage (click any control)

SA-15800-53
Development Process & Tools
75%
20%
TestifySec GRC
GitHub Actions · GitLab CI · Jenkins
SA-10800-53
Developer Configuration Mgmt
70%
25%
TestifySec GRC
Sigstore · Cosign · Git
SA-11800-53
Developer Testing & Evaluation
80%
TestifySec GRC
pytest · Jest · SonarQube
SI-7800-53
Software & Firmware Integrity
85%
TestifySec GRC
Cosign · Gatekeeper · Kyverno
SI-2800-53
Flaw Remediation
60%
30%
TestifySec GRC
Dependabot · Renovate · Snyk
CM-2800-53
Baseline Configuration
65%
30%
TestifySec GRC
Helm · Terraform · ArgoCD
CM-3800-53
Configuration Change Control
70%
25%
TestifySec GRC
ArgoCD · Flux · Crossplane
CM-8800-53
System Component Inventory
90%
TestifySec GRC
Syft · Trivy · CycloneDX
CM-14800-53
Signed Components
80%
TestifySec GRC
Cosign · Notary · Sigstore
SR-3800-53
Supply Chain Controls
80%
TestifySec GRC
SLSA · In-Toto · Witness
SR-4800-53
Provenance
85%
TestifySec GRC
SLSA · Witness · Sigstore
RA-5800-53
Vulnerability Scanning
75%
20%
TestifySec GRC
Trivy · Grype · Snyk
AU-12800-53
Audit Record Generation
85%
TestifySec GRC
Witness · Rekor · In-Toto
CA-7800-53
Continuous Monitoring
75%
20%
TestifySec GRC
Prometheus · Falco · Datadog
SC-8800-53
Transmission Security
65%
25%
TestifySec GRC
Istio · Linkerd · Cilium
SC-13800-53
Cryptographic Protection
60%
30%
TestifySec GRC
BoringCrypto · OpenSSL FIPS
AC-6800-53
Least Privilege
55%
35%
TestifySec GRC
K8s RBAC · OPA · Kyverno
SA-15800-53
Development Process & Tools
75%
20%
TestifySec GRC
GitHub Actions · GitLab CI · Jenkins
SA-10800-53
Developer Configuration Mgmt
70%
25%
TestifySec GRC
Sigstore · Cosign · Git
SA-11800-53
Developer Testing & Evaluation
80%
TestifySec GRC
pytest · Jest · SonarQube
SI-7800-53
Software & Firmware Integrity
85%
TestifySec GRC
Cosign · Gatekeeper · Kyverno
SI-2800-53
Flaw Remediation
60%
30%
TestifySec GRC
Dependabot · Renovate · Snyk
CM-2800-53
Baseline Configuration
65%
30%
TestifySec GRC
Helm · Terraform · ArgoCD
CM-3800-53
Configuration Change Control
70%
25%
TestifySec GRC
ArgoCD · Flux · Crossplane
CM-8800-53
System Component Inventory
90%
TestifySec GRC
Syft · Trivy · CycloneDX
CM-14800-53
Signed Components
80%
TestifySec GRC
Cosign · Notary · Sigstore
SR-3800-53
Supply Chain Controls
80%
TestifySec GRC
SLSA · In-Toto · Witness
SR-4800-53
Provenance
85%
TestifySec GRC
SLSA · Witness · Sigstore
RA-5800-53
Vulnerability Scanning
75%
20%
TestifySec GRC
Trivy · Grype · Snyk
AU-12800-53
Audit Record Generation
85%
TestifySec GRC
Witness · Rekor · In-Toto
CA-7800-53
Continuous Monitoring
75%
20%
TestifySec GRC
Prometheus · Falco · Datadog
SC-8800-53
Transmission Security
65%
25%
TestifySec GRC
Istio · Linkerd · Cilium
SC-13800-53
Cryptographic Protection
60%
30%
TestifySec GRC
BoringCrypto · OpenSSL FIPS
AC-6800-53
Least Privilege
55%
35%
TestifySec GRC
K8s RBAC · OPA · Kyverno
Example Integrations
GitHub Actions GitLab CI Jenkins CircleCI Azure DevOps Bitbucket Travis CI Drone CI Buildkite TeamCity ArgoCD Flux Spinnaker Tekton Harness Kubernetes OpenShift Rancher Docker Podman containerd CRI-O Terraform Pulumi CloudFormation Ansible Helm Kustomize AWS GCP Azure DigitalOcean Sigstore Cosign Rekor Fulcio Witness SLSA In-Toto Notary TUF Trivy Snyk Grype Syft Clair Anchore Aqua Dependabot Renovate SonarQube Semgrep CodeQL Checkmarx Veracode OPA Kyverno Gatekeeper Polaris Conftest Falco Sysdig Cilium Calico Istio Linkerd Envoy Prometheus Datadog Splunk Grafana Elastic New Relic Vault AWS Secrets CyberArk SPDX CycloneDX VEX Maven npm pip Go Modules Cargo Artifactory Nexus Harbor ECR GCR Docker Hub GitHub Actions GitLab CI Jenkins CircleCI Azure DevOps Bitbucket Travis CI Drone CI Buildkite TeamCity ArgoCD Flux Spinnaker Tekton Harness Kubernetes OpenShift Rancher Docker Podman containerd CRI-O Terraform Pulumi CloudFormation Ansible Helm Kustomize AWS GCP Azure DigitalOcean Sigstore Cosign Rekor Fulcio Witness SLSA In-Toto Notary TUF Trivy Snyk Grype Syft Clair Anchore Aqua Dependabot Renovate SonarQube Semgrep CodeQL Checkmarx Veracode OPA Kyverno Gatekeeper Polaris Conftest Falco Sysdig Cilium Calico Istio Linkerd Envoy Prometheus Datadog Splunk Grafana Elastic New Relic Vault AWS Secrets CyberArk SPDX CycloneDX VEX Maven npm pip Go Modules Cargo Artifactory Nexus Harbor ECR GCR Docker Hub

1000+ Controls

Full NIST 800-53 catalog coverage

Our scope: If it's in your repository or part of your build/deployment pipeline, we automate documentation and evidence collection for it.

Physical security, HR policies, training? That's what Vanta, Drata, and Paramify are for.

SA-15: Development Process, Standards, and Tools

NIST 800-53 Rev 5 — Require documented development processes that address security requirements, identify standards and tools, and ensure integrity of changes.

How TestifySec Automates This

  • Generates Build Attestations documenting CI/CD pipeline architecture and security controls
  • Collects SBOM (Software Bill of Materials) artifacts from Syft, Trivy, or CycloneDX generators
  • Captures Tool Configuration Evidence with cryptographic signatures via Sigstore
  • Documents build environment state with In-Toto Attestations

Example Integrations

  • GitHub Actions GitLab CI Jenkins CircleCI — CI/CD pipeline configs
  • Tekton ArgoCD Flux — Cloud-native CD pipelines
  • Buildkite Azure DevOps AWS CodePipeline — Enterprise CI

FedRAMP Parameters

  • SA-15(b)-1: Review frequency before first use and annually thereafter
  • SA-15(b)-2: Must satisfy FedRAMP Security Authorization requirements

SA-10: Developer Configuration Management

NIST 800-53 Rev 5 — Perform configuration management during design, development, implementation, and operation; document and control integrity of changes.

How TestifySec Automates This

  • Generates Environment Attestations documenting build server state per SLSA requirements
  • Creates Process Attestations tracking source-to-artifact transformations
  • Verifies Signed Commit evidence via GPG/SSH signature detection
  • Detects Security Flaw Tracking through integrated vulnerability scanners

Example Integrations

  • GitHub GitLab Bitbucket — Version control with signed commits
  • Cosign Sigstore Notary — Artifact signing and verification
  • Docker Hub ECR GCR Harbor — Container registries

FedRAMP Parameters

  • SA-10(a): Applies to development, implementation, AND operation
  • SA-10(e): Track security flaws and report findings to FedRAMP

SI-7: Software, Firmware, and Information Integrity

NIST 800-53 Rev 5 — Employ integrity verification tools to detect unauthorized changes to software, firmware, and information.

How TestifySec Automates This

  • Verifies Container Image Signatures using cryptographic hashes per NIST SP 800-190
  • Detects Admission Controller Policies that block unsigned artifacts
  • Collects Runtime Integrity evidence from monitoring tools
  • Verifies Immutable Infrastructure patterns in Kubernetes deployments

Example Integrations

  • Sigstore/Cosign Notary — Image signing verification
  • OPA Gatekeeper Kyverno — Policy enforcement engines
  • Falco Sysdig Aqua — Runtime security monitoring
  • Trivy Grype Snyk — Vulnerability scanning

FedRAMP Parameters

  • SI-7(1): Integrity checks at security-relevant events and at least monthly
  • SI-7(15): Code authentication for all software/firmware inside the boundary

CM-3: Configuration Change Control

NIST 800-53 Rev 5 — Review proposed changes, approve/disapprove with security impact analysis, document decisions, and monitor change activities.

How TestifySec Automates This

  • Detects GitOps Workflows using Git as the immutable source of truth
  • Verifies PR-Based Changes with mandatory security review gates
  • Validates Policy-as-Code configurations via OPA/Rego policies
  • Detects Configuration Drift comparing live state to declared state

Example Integrations

  • ArgoCD Flux — GitOps continuous delivery
  • Terraform Pulumi Crossplane — Infrastructure as Code
  • Helm Kustomize — Kubernetes configuration management
  • Checkov tfsec KICS — IaC security scanning

FedRAMP Parameters

  • CM-3: Establish central means of communicating major changes approved by JAB/AO
  • CM-3(6): Cryptographic mechanisms under configuration management for all security safeguards

SR-3: Supply Chain Controls and Processes

NIST 800-53 Rev 5 — Establish processes to identify and address supply chain weaknesses or deficiencies.

How TestifySec Automates This

  • Collects SBOM artifacts in SPDX/CycloneDX formats per NTIA minimum elements
  • Collects Dependency Analysis results detecting known vulnerabilities (CVE/NVD)
  • Verifies Supplier Security through dependency source verification
  • Detects Tamper Evidence through cryptographic hash validation

Example Integrations

  • Syft Trivy CycloneDX — SBOM generation
  • Grype Snyk Dependabot — Vulnerability scanning
  • Renovate Dependabot — Dependency updates

FedRAMP Parameters

  • SR-3: CSO must document and maintain supply chain custody including replacement devices
  • SR-6: Supplier assessments at least annually per NIST SP 800-171 alignment

SR-4: Provenance

NIST 800-53 Rev 5 — Document, monitor, and maintain valid provenance of system components to validate authenticity and integrity.

How TestifySec Automates This

  • Verifies SLSA Framework compliance (Levels 1-3) for provenance attestations
  • Validates Artifact Provenance with cryptographic verification chains
  • Generates Build Attestations with immutable provenance records
  • Verifies Source Origin through signed commits and tag verification

Example Integrations

  • SLSA In-Toto Witness — Provenance attestation
  • Sigstore Cosign Rekor — Signing and transparency
  • GitHub Actions GitLab CI — Build provenance

FedRAMP Parameters

  • SR-4: Must document provenance of systems, components, or services
  • SR-4(3): Validate authenticity through cryptographic mechanisms

SC-8: Transmission Confidentiality and Integrity

NIST 800-53 Rev 5 — Protect the confidentiality and integrity of transmitted information using cryptographic mechanisms.

How TestifySec Automates This

  • Detects mTLS Configuration in service mesh deployments
  • Collects Build Logs showing FIPS-validated crypto module usage
  • Verifies SBOM Dependencies for FIPS-compliant cryptographic libraries
  • Collects Network Policy evidence from Kubernetes clusters

Example Integrations

  • Istio Linkerd Consul Connect — Service mesh mTLS
  • BoringCrypto OpenSSL FIPS — FIPS module detection in SBOMs
  • Cilium Calico — Network policy enforcement
  • cert-manager Vault PKI — Certificate management

FedRAMP Parameters

  • SC-8: Must protect confidentiality AND integrity for all data in transit
  • SC-8(1): Cryptographic protection using FIPS 140-2/140-3 validated modules

CA-7: Continuous Monitoring

NIST 800-53 Rev 5 — Develop a system-level continuous monitoring strategy and implement monitoring per organizational guidance.

How TestifySec Automates This

  • Generates Continuous Attestations on every build and deployment
  • Collects Security Scan Results from integrated vulnerability scanners
  • Verifies Policy Compliance against OPA/Rego policies in real-time
  • Detects Configuration Changes through GitOps workflow monitoring

Example Integrations

  • Prometheus Grafana Datadog — Metrics and observability
  • Falco Sysdig Aqua — Runtime security monitoring
  • Splunk Elastic Loki — Log aggregation
  • PagerDuty Opsgenie — Incident alerting

FedRAMP Parameters

  • CA-7(b): Report security status to AO at least monthly
  • CA-7(4): Risk monitoring aligned with FedRAMP continuous monitoring requirements

SA-11: Developer Testing and Evaluation

NIST 800-53 Rev 5 — Require developers to create and implement a security assessment plan, unit/integration/system testing, and document flaw remediation.

How TestifySec Automates This

  • Generates Test Attestations documenting test execution and results
  • Collects Code Coverage metrics from testing frameworks
  • Collects SAST/DAST Results from security testing tools
  • Verifies Test Gate Policies requiring passing tests before deployment

Example Integrations

  • pytest Jest Go test JUnit — Unit testing
  • SonarQube Semgrep CodeQL — SAST analysis
  • OWASP ZAP Burp Suite — DAST scanning

FedRAMP Parameters

  • SA-11(a): Perform unit, integration, system, and regression testing
  • SA-11(b): Produce evidence of security assessment plan execution

CM-2: Baseline Configuration

NIST 800-53 Rev 5 — Develop, document, and maintain a current baseline configuration of the system under configuration control.

How TestifySec Automates This

  • Generates Configuration Attestations documenting deployed state
  • Detects Helm Chart Versions and values in Kubernetes deployments
  • Collects Terraform State files showing infrastructure configuration
  • Verifies Container Image Digests match declared baseline

Example Integrations

  • Helm Kustomize — Kubernetes configuration
  • Terraform Pulumi AWS CDK — Infrastructure as Code
  • ArgoCD Flux — GitOps desired state

FedRAMP Parameters

  • CM-2: Baseline includes hardware, software, firmware, and documentation
  • CM-2(2): Automation support for accurate and current baseline

CM-8: System Component Inventory

NIST 800-53 Rev 5 — Develop and document an inventory of system components that accurately reflects the system and is at the granularity needed for tracking.

How TestifySec Automates This

  • Collects SBOM artifacts providing complete software inventory
  • Detects Container Image Layers and installed packages
  • Collects Dependency Trees including transitive dependencies
  • Generates Inventory Attestations with cryptographic signatures

Example Integrations

  • Syft Trivy CycloneDX CLI — SBOM generation
  • SPDX CycloneDX — Standard formats
  • Dependency-Track — Component analysis

FedRAMP Parameters

  • CM-8(a): Inventory includes all components within authorization boundary
  • CM-8(3): Automated detection of unauthorized components

CM-14: Signed Components

NIST 800-53 Rev 5 — Prevent installation of software and firmware without verification that components have been digitally signed.

How TestifySec Automates This

  • Verifies Container Image Signatures via Cosign/Sigstore
  • Validates Attestation Signatures using Rekor transparency log
  • Detects Admission Policies requiring signed images
  • Collects Signature Verification Logs from registries

Example Integrations

  • Cosign Sigstore Notary — Signing tools
  • Kyverno OPA Gatekeeper — Policy enforcement
  • Connaisseur Harbor — Registry validation

FedRAMP Parameters

  • CM-14: Certificates must be recognized and approved by the organization

RA-5: Vulnerability Monitoring and Scanning

NIST 800-53 Rev 5 — Monitor and scan for vulnerabilities in the system and hosted applications per organization-defined frequency.

How TestifySec Automates This

  • Collects Vulnerability Scan Results with CVE findings and severity
  • Generates Scan Attestations documenting scan execution
  • Detects Scanner Configurations in CI/CD pipelines
  • Collects EPSS Scores for prioritization evidence

Example Integrations

  • Trivy Grype Snyk — Container scanning
  • Clair Anchore — Registry scanning
  • Qualys Tenable AWS Inspector — Enterprise scanning

FedRAMP Parameters

  • RA-5(a): Scan frequency monthly for OS/infrastructure, on change for web apps
  • RA-5(d): Remediate high vulnerabilities within 30 days, moderate within 90 days

SI-2: Flaw Remediation

NIST 800-53 Rev 5 — Identify, report, and correct system flaws; test updates for effectiveness and side effects before installation.

How TestifySec Automates This

  • Collects Remediation PRs from dependency update tools
  • Detects Vulnerability Fix Commits in version control
  • Generates Before/After Scan Attestations proving remediation
  • Collects Patch Deployment Evidence from CI/CD

Example Integrations

  • Dependabot Renovate Snyk — Automated updates
  • GitHub Security GitLab Security — Advisory tracking
  • NVD OSV — Vulnerability databases

FedRAMP Parameters

  • SI-2(a): Install updates within 30 days for high, 90 days for moderate
  • SI-2(2): Employ automated mechanisms for flaw remediation status

AU-12: Audit Record Generation

NIST 800-53 Rev 5 — Provide audit record generation capability for auditable events; allow personnel to select events to be audited.

How TestifySec Automates This

  • Generates Cryptographically Signed Attestations for every build
  • Creates Immutable Audit Trail via Rekor transparency log
  • Collects Build/Test/Deploy Events with timestamps
  • Generates Policy Evaluation Logs for admission decisions

Example Integrations

  • Witness In-Toto — Attestation generation
  • Rekor Sigstore — Transparency logs
  • CloudEvents — Event format standard

FedRAMP Parameters

  • AU-12(a): Generate audit records for events defined in AU-2
  • AU-12(c): Generate records containing content defined in AU-3

SC-13: Cryptographic Protection

NIST 800-53 Rev 5 — Implement FIPS-validated or NSA-approved cryptography in accordance with applicable laws and policies.

How TestifySec Automates This

  • Verifies FIPS Modules in SBOMs detecting validated crypto libraries
  • Collects Build Logs showing FIPS mode compilation flags
  • Detects Crypto Library Versions against CMVP certificates
  • Collects TLS Configuration evidence from deployments

Example Integrations

  • BoringCrypto Go FIPS — FIPS-validated Go crypto
  • OpenSSL FIPS AWS-LC — FIPS modules
  • CMVP — Certificate validation lookups

FedRAMP Parameters

  • SC-13: Use FIPS 140-2/140-3 validated cryptography
  • SC-13: Cryptographic modules must be in FIPS mode of operation

AC-6: Least Privilege

NIST 800-53 Rev 5 — Employ the principle of least privilege, allowing only authorized accesses necessary to accomplish assigned tasks.

How TestifySec Automates This

  • Detects Kubernetes RBAC configurations in cluster
  • Collects Service Account Permissions from deployments
  • Validates OPA/Rego Policies enforcing least privilege
  • Detects Pod Security Standards restricting capabilities

Example Integrations

  • Kubernetes RBAC — Role and RoleBinding configs
  • OPA Gatekeeper Kyverno — Policy enforcement
  • AWS IAM GCP IAM Azure RBAC — Cloud permissions

FedRAMP Parameters

  • AC-6: Grant minimum access necessary for job functions
  • AC-6(9): Log execution of privileged functions
Time to Authorization

Traditional vs. TestifySec Path

Traditional Path (12-18 months)
Month 1-3: Gap assessment + consultant meetings 3+ months
Month 4-8: SSP writing (engineer interviews) 5 months
Month 9-12: Evidence scramble
Month 13-16: 3PAO back-and-forth
Month 17-18: Remediation + re-audit

Total cost: $400K-$600K

TestifySec Path (6-9 months)
Day 1: AI-generated SSP + gap analysis < 6 hours
Day 2: Pipeline instrumentation 1 day
Week 1-2: Compliance/security team refines AI output
Month 1-3: Gap remediation + evidence auto-collecting
Month 4-6: 3PAO audit (smooth)

Total cost: $150K-$200K

SSP Quality

Consultant Template vs. AI-Generated

Generic Consultant Template
[Organization] employs [insert method] to authenticate users. Access controls are managed through [insert tool]. User permissions are reviewed [insert frequency] by [insert role].
AI-Generated from Your Code
Authentication via Keycloak (v22.0.1) using OIDC with JWT tokens. RBAC enforced via k8s/rbac/namespaces.yaml ServiceAccounts use 1h TTL tokens. All auth events -> Splunk via FluentD. Evidence: git+sha256:abc123#L45-60
Who Does What

Clear Responsibility Matrix

Task Developers TestifySec Compliance
Push code normally
Generate attestations
Store evidence
Map to FedRAMP controls
Generate SSP draft
Review & approve SSP
Coordinate with 3PAO
Developers don't change anything. They keep shipping features.
Calculate Your Savings

What does the gap cost you?

50
4
1
Current Annual Cost
$2.2M
Click for breakdown
With TestifySec
$547K
Click for breakdown
Annual Savings
$1.7M
Click for breakdown
Cost Breakdown
Without With
SSP consultants $100K $20K
$75K-$150K typical for FedRAMP Moderate SSP development. With TestifySec: 80% reduction via AI-generated SSP drafts.
Source: StackArmor
3PAO fees $200K $200K
$125K-$195K for FedRAMP Moderate assessment. No reduction — 3PAO audit is required regardless.
Source: Paramify
Dev evidence gathering $1.6M $234K
Devs × hrs/week × 52 weeks × $150/hr. Studies show devs spend 7.5+ hrs/week on compliance. With TestifySec: 85% reduction via automated attestations.
Source: Security Magazine
Compliance overtime $50K $20K
Compliance managers spend 15+ hrs/week on manual tasks. Scales with team size. With TestifySec: 60% reduction.
Source: Hyperproof
Delayed launches $333K $33K
FedRAMP auth takes 12-18 months on average. Opportunity cost of delayed market entry. With TestifySec: 90% reduction via continuous compliance.
Source: Paramify
TestifySec Core Cost $40K
$600/year per developer + $10K onboarding per product. Includes full platform access, attestation infrastructure, SSP generation, and continuous compliance monitoring.
Total $2.2M $547K
Auditor Acceptance

Why auditors will accept this evidence

We Wrote the Standard

Co-authored NIST 800-204D
Supply chain evidence requirements

Traceable

Control → source in one click
Matches your actual config

Collaborative

Everyone comments
AI converges on the right answer

Evidence traces to CI/CD, infrastructure as code, and source. Auditors verify independently.
For Your InfoSec Team

Security FAQ

What do you access?
Source code and build artifacts. Never secrets.
You control and audit all permissions.
What do you store?
Only build and evaluation metadata.
Source code is never stored — evaluated and discarded.
Can you modify our repos?
No. Read-only permissions.
Audit every API call via GitHub audit log.
Do you train AI on our data?
Your source code is never used for AI training.
Customer Proof

Autodesk: FedRAMP Moderate ATO

"Witness and Archivista have reduced developer friction so significantly... we can now run secure by default. We don't have to ask our software development teams to go through any hurdles to get to the point where proof is generated."
— Jesse Sanford, Software Architect, Autodesk
FedRAMP Moderate ATO achieved
Zero Developer hurdles
Automated Evidence collection
Investment

Transparent Pricing

Per Seat
$600/year
Developers + compliance team
Unlimited repos
Full platform access
Onboarding
$10K one-time
Per product
Implementation support
Training & setup
Example: 50 seats, 1 product
$30K annual + $10K onboarding = $40K first year

See your gap in 15 minutes

1
Connect Repo
2
See Gap Report
3
Review Savings
100% FREE — No strings attached
What you'll get:
  • Complete software component inventory with risk assessment
  • Ready-to-use SSP documentation for 5 critical controls
  • Customized ROI projection for your team
  • Prioritized compliance gap report with remediation steps
Potential savings: $200K - $500K annually